Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • J
  • Jordan v. Baptist Three Rivers HospitalJordan v. Baptist Three Rivers Hospital
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Jordan v. Baptist Three Rivers Hospital

Tennessee Supreme Court
984 S.W.2d 593 (1999)


Martha Jordan (plaintiff), as a surviving child and administratrix of the estate of her mother, Mary Sue Douglas, filed a medical malpractice action against Baptist Three Rivers Hospital and Drs. Mark Anderson, Noel Dominguez, and Patrick Murphy (defendants) alleging they negligently caused Douglas’s death. Jordan sought damages for loss of consortium. The defendants moved for a judgment on the pleadings alleging that Tennessee law did not allow damages for loss of parental consortium. The trial court agreed and dismissed Jordan’s complaint. Jordan appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Holder, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 448,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 448,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial