Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Jordan v. Jordan

257 S.E.2d 761 (1979)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...

Jordan v. Jordan

Virginia Supreme Court

257 S.E.2d 761 (1979)

Facts

John Jordan (plaintiff) and Lena Jordan (defendant), husband and wife, visited the home of one of Lena’s friends. John left the house after Lena told him she was not ready to leave. Lena used the front door to leave the house 45 to 50 minutes later. She looked for but did not see John and assumed he was angry and had walked home. Lena got in her car and backed up to avoid a hole in the driveway and a parked truck. Lena did not look behind her or use her rearview mirror before backing up the car. Lena’s car hit John, who had been squatting behind the car and stood up only when he heard the engine start. The car ran over John, causing him to suffer a broken leg, a fractured hip, and minor injuries. John brought a negligence action against Lena. The jury found in favor of John. Lena appealed, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to establish actionable negligence.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership