Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Jorgensen v. Pressnall

545 P.2d 1382 (1976)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

Jorgensen v. Pressnall

Oregon Supreme Court

545 P.2d 1382 (1976)

Play video

Facts

Gordon and Kathryn Jorgensen (plaintiffs) purchased a mobile home from Ronald Pressnall (defendant). Pressnall had told the Jorgensens that the mobile home was of “good, sound construction,” and that any factory defects would be promptly repaired. The Jorgensens paid a down payment and signed a financing agreement with Pressnall. Pressnall assigned the finance contract to Commercial Credit Company (Commercial Credit) (defendant). When Pressnall assigned the finance contract, Pressnall warranted that the contract would be enforceable against the Jorgensens. When the Jorgensens moved in, they discovered that the mobile home had serious structural defects, including cracks in the walls and plumbing leaks. The Jorgensens notified Pressnall of the defects, and Pressnall said the defects would be fixed. Pressnall sent handymen to the Jorgensens’ home, but the handymen failed to make adequate repairs. After about two months, the Jorgensens rejected Pressnall’s further attempts to repair the mobile home. The Jorgensens returned the mobile home and notified Pressnall and Commercial Credit that the Jorgensens were rescinding or undoing the sales contract. Commercial Credit repossessed and sold the mobile home at a loss. The Jorgensens sued Pressnall and Commercial Credit for rescission, the return of their down payment, and consequential damages. Commercial Credit asserted a crossclaim against Pressnall for damages. The trial court entered judgment against Pressnall on both the Jorgensens’ rescission claim and Commercial Credit’s damages claim. Pressnall appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Connell, C. J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership