Joshua A. v. Rocklin Unified School District
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
319 Fed. Appx. 692 (2009)
- Written by Jody Stuart, JD
Facts
Joshua A. (plaintiff) had autism and attended school in the Rocklin Unified School District (Rocklin) (defendant). Joshua asserted to an administrative-law judge that Rocklin failed to provide him with a free and appropriate public education for the 2006–2007 school year. The administrative-law judge issued a detailed 22-page opinion, finding that Rocklin’s individualized education program (IEP) was valid under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (act) because the IEP (1) was effectively tailored to Joshua’s unique needs, (2) was supervised and administered by qualified personnel, and (3) was based on accepted principles in the field of autism education. These findings were consistent with the testimonial opinions of several experts who observed Joshua in the classroom and testified that Rocklin’s program conformed to best practices in the field. Joshua appealed the administrative-law judge’s decision in federal district court, arguing that the judge’s decision failed to require that Rocklin’s IEP provide a meaningful benefit under the act. The district court agreed with the administrative-law judge’s decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Noonan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.