Joshua Navarro v. Florida Institute of Technology

No. 6:22-cv-1950-CEM-EJK (2023)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Joshua Navarro v. Florida Institute of Technology

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida
No. 6:22-cv-1950-CEM-EJK (2023)

SC

Facts

The Florida Institute of Technology (FIT) (defendant) eliminated men’s varsity rowing and four other varsity sports. Joshua Navarro and five other former members of the eliminated FIT rowing team (rowers) (plaintiffs) filed a putative class-action lawsuit against FIT for violation of Title IX. The rowers presented evidence that men constituted approximately 71 percent of undergraduate enrollment at FIT but only 64 percent of varsity athletes. The rowers argued that this constituted a violation of Title IX and that because FIT was already violating Title IX, it could not cut a men’s program. The rowers moved for a preliminary injunction. FIT argued that if esports student-athletes and online students were counted in the calculations, the gap in men’s and women’s participation would be de minimis. Esports participants at FIT were not recruited off campus; esports did not have a uniform set of rules, as each video game was created by an independent company; and esports did not have a progressive playoff system like other college sports.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mendoza, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership