Joshua Navarro v. Florida Institute of Technology
United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida
No. 6:22-cv-1950-CEM-EJK (2023)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Florida Institute of Technology (FIT) (defendant) eliminated men’s varsity rowing and four other varsity sports. Joshua Navarro and five other former members of the eliminated FIT rowing team (rowers) (plaintiffs) filed a putative class-action lawsuit against FIT for violation of Title IX. The rowers presented evidence that men constituted approximately 71 percent of undergraduate enrollment at FIT but only 64 percent of varsity athletes. The rowers argued that this constituted a violation of Title IX and that because FIT was already violating Title IX, it could not cut a men’s program. The rowers moved for a preliminary injunction. FIT argued that if esports student-athletes and online students were counted in the calculations, the gap in men’s and women’s participation would be de minimis. Esports participants at FIT were not recruited off campus; esports did not have a uniform set of rules, as each video game was created by an independent company; and esports did not have a progressive playoff system like other college sports.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mendoza, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.