Joy v. North
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
692 F.2d 880 (1982)
[Editor’s Note: The factual background of this case is not provided in the casebook excerpt. A summary is included here only to provide context.]
Citytrust (defendant) made a series of questionable loans, sometimes unsecured or exceeding federal statutory limits, to the Katz Corporation (Katz) in connection with Katz’s construction of an office building. The loans totaled more than $2.5 million. Citytrust obtained a second mortgage on the office building, and Katz’s partnership later turned over title to the building to Citytrust, which assumed Katz’s mortgage to an outside lender. Citytrust sold the building, but the buyer defaulted. There is no evidence that the rental income derived from the building is sufficient to meet the obligations assumed by Citytrust. Dr. Athalie Joy (plaintiff) filed a shareholder’s derivative claim on behalf of Citytrust Bancorp, Inc. (previously known as Connecticut Financial Services Corporation) (Bancorp), Citytrust’s parent company, after making an unsuccessful demand on the board. The suit charged Citytrust, its officers, and directors with breach of trust, fiduciary duty, and federal law. Bancorp’s board authorized a Special Litigation Committee to investigate, and the committee recommended dismissing the suit for most defendants and settling with others who may have been negligent. Joy refused to withdraw the lawsuit. The district court took discovery on the committee’s competence and independence before granting summary judgment to the outside defendants, concluding that the committee was entitled to the protection of the business judgment rule. Joy appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Winter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 148,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.