Judd v. Drezga
Utah Supreme Court
103 P.3d 135 (2004)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Athan Montgomery (plaintiff) was born with severe brain damage as a result of a failed attempt by Dr. Gregory Drezga (defendant) to deliver Montgomery using forceps. Heidi Judd (plaintiff), personally and as the parent and guardian of Montgomery, brought suit against Drezga. At trial, the jury awarded Montgomery $22,735.30 for the amounts already expended to maintain his life, $1,000,000 to continue maintaining his life, and $1,250,000 in noneconomic damages for diminished quality and enjoyment of life. Drezga moved to reduce the noneconomic damages based on a Utah statute capping some forms of damages for medical-malpractice victims at $250,000. The trial court granted Drezga’s motion. Judd appealed, arguing that the cap violated the Utah Constitution because the cap deprived state citizens of a remedy and discriminated against certain classes of plaintiffs.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wilkins, J.)
Dissent (Durham, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.