Judgment of the International Military Tribunal (Germany v. Italy)
Nuremburg, Sept. 30, 1946
Reprinted in 41 A.J.I.L. 186-218 (1946)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Members of the National Socialist (Nazi) Party in Germany (defendants) orchestrated an invasion of Poland in 1939 and also seized Austria and Czechoslovakia, beginning World War II. The defendants’ invasion had been pre-planned and carefully orchestrated in order to expand the territory of Germany. The defendants knew that war would probably be necessary to achieve their goals. Under the terms of the London Agreement—signed after World War II by France, the United Kingdom, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (U.S.S.R.), and the United States—an International Military Tribunal was formed to try the war criminals of World War II, including the defendants. The Nuremburg Charter that formed the tribunal defined crimes against peace as “planning, preparation, initiation, or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties.”
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.