From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
Judin v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
110 F.3d 780, 42 U.S.P.Q.2d 1300 (1997)
Patent holder Herbert Judin (plaintiff) and his attorneys, including Robert Van Der Wall, filed a patent-infringement claim against the government (defendant) in the Court of Federal Claims, asserting that the United States Postal Service (the Postal Service) used a device that infringed on Judin’s patent. Judin and Van Der Wall became aware of the potential infringement by observing from afar a post office using a device that, like his patented device, used a light source to direct light through a round tip and focus on a pinpoint. Neither Judin nor any of his attorneys attempted to obtain a device or reverse engineer a copy to compare to Judin’s patent claims, nor did they offer the court an explanation for this failure. Van Der Wall reviewed one of the multiple asserted patent claims and said it looked fine prior to filing the lawsuit. Van Der Wall and Judin signed the patent-infringement complaint. Hewlett Packard (defendant) moved for sanctions against Judin and his attorneys under Rule 11 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (Rule 11), which was patterned after Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. The Court of Federal Claims denied the motion for sanctions. Hewlett Packard appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Plager, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.