Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Julian v. Christopher

Court of Appeals of Maryland
575 A.2d 735 (1990)


Facts

Douglas Julian and William J. Gilleland (defendants) leased a tavern and restaurant business and upstairs apartment from Guy D. Christopher (plaintiff). The lease contained a silent consent clause, stating that the lease could not be assigned or sublet without the landlord’s approval. When the lease was signed, Christopher told the tenants that the clause was simply to keep them from assigning or subletting to “someone who would tear the apartment up.” The tenants later asked Christopher for permission to sublet the upstairs apartment, and Christopher told them he would consent only if they would pay an additional $150 per month in rent. The tenants allowed the sublessee to move in, and Christopher filed an action to repossess the building. At trial, the judge refused to consider Christopher’s oral representation of the purpose of the clause. He considered only the words of the lease, and found that the lease allowed the landlord to withhold consent for any reason whatsoever. Accordingly, he ruled in favor of Christopher. The intermediate appellate court affirmed the ruling. Julian and Gilleland then appealed to the state supreme court, asking it to revisit a precedent that, given an appropriate provision in the lease, a landlord could withhold consent to sublease even if withholding consent was arbitrary and unreasonable.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Chasanow, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.