Jurek v. Texas

428 U.S. 262, 96 S. Ct. 2950, 49 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1976)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jurek v. Texas

United States Supreme Court
428 U.S. 262, 96 S. Ct. 2950, 49 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1976)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD
Play video

Facts

Jerry Jurek (defendant) was found guilty of murder of 10-year-old Wendy Adams. The Texas penal code limits capital murder to five categories of homicide such as murder of a peace officer or murder during a serious crime like kidnapping or rape. The evidence at trial included several eyewitnesses who had testified against Jurek. Two of Jurek’s friends were driving around with Jurek in Jurek’s pickup truck the day of the murder. When Jurek expressed a desire to have sexual relations with some young girls, one of the friends said the girls were too young. Jurek dropped off the two friends. Jurek was observed talking to Adams at a public swimming pool. Witnesses testified that they had seen Jurek driving through town with a young blonde girl in his pickup truck. One witness testified that the girl was screaming for help. That witness attempted, but failed, to follow the pickup truck. According to Jurek’s own statement, he took Adams to the river, choked her, and threw her into the river. After the jury returned a guilty verdict, the trial court conducted a separate sentencing proceeding with the trial jury. In the proceeding, the state (plaintiff) called several witnesses who testified to Jurek’s bad reputation. Jurek’s father testified positively as to Jurek’s character. Per a state statute, the jury answered two questions about Jurek’s case to determine whether the death penalty should be imposed. First, was the murder committed deliberately and with the reasonable expectation of death of another beyond a reasonable doubt? Second, was there a probability that Jurek would commit criminal acts of violence that constituted a threat to society beyond a reasonable doubt? The jury answered affirmatively to both questions. The answers were unanimous. The judge then sentenced Jurek to death. Jurek appealed to the Texas appellate court, which affirmed the judgment. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership