Jürgen Römer v. Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg

2011 E.C.R. 1-03591 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jürgen Römer v. Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg

European Union Court of Justice
2011 E.C.R. 1-03591 (2011)

Facts

Jürgen Römer (plaintiff) was an employee of the City of Hamburg, Germany. In 1990, Römer retired and began receiving pension payments. German law did not recognize same-sex marriages, but same-sex couples could register their partnerships. In 2001, Römer and his same-sex life partner registered their partnership. Römer asked the pension administrator (defendant) to recalculate the pension payments to account for Römer’s registered life partnership, because married pensioners received higher pension payments than unmarried pensioners. The pension administrator refused. Römer took the matter to the Hamburg Labor Court, which referred several questions to the European Union Court of Justice (EUCJ). One of the questions was whether the issue of discrimination based on marital status fell within the jurisdiction of the EUCJ. The advocate general of the EUCJ issued an advisory opinion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jääskinen, Advocate General)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership