Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece Intervening)

2012 I.C.J. 99

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
J
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece Intervening)

International Court of Justice
2012 I.C.J. 99

SC
Play video

Facts

Italian civilians brought a number of civil claims in various Italian courts against the German government for the atrocities committed in the latter stages of World War II, including the imprisonment, forced labor, and murder of civilians. The Italian courts ruled in favor of the Italian civilians. Germany (plaintiff) filed an application with the International Court of Justice, seeking to have the judgments set aside on account of the German government’s jurisdictional immunity. Italy (defendant) argued that the jus cogens rules against the imprisonment, forced labor, and murder of civilians conflicted with the customary international law of immunity. As a result, Italy argued that the jus cogens status of the prohibitions must override the law of immunity.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

Dissent (Trindade, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 779,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Alternative Dispute Resolution
International Law

Key Terms