K.B. v. Nebo School District

379 F.3d 966 (2004)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

K.B. v. Nebo School District

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
379 F.3d 966 (2004)

Facts

K.B. was a disabled child who received special-education services from the Nebo School District (the district) (defendant). K.B.’s parents (plaintiffs) believed that K.B. had not been provided with a free appropriate public education (FAPE) as required under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and filed an administrative appeal over this issue. Dr. Steven Hirase was the impartial-hearing officer (IHO) who presided over the proceedings. Hirase was the assistant superintendent at a different school district. K.B.’s parents moved to disqualify Hirase, alleging that he was not impartial because Hirase’s wife and the district’s autism expert witness both worked in another school district. However, there was no evidence that Hirase’s wife and the expert witness worked together or even knew each other. Hirase denied K.B.’s parents’ motion and held that the district had provided K.B. with a FAPE. K.B.’s parents filed a complaint in federal district court seeking review of the decision. The district court affirmed Hirase’s decision, concluding that he had not been biased. K.B.’s parents appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership