K.B. v. Nebo School District
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
379 F.3d 966 (2004)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
K.B. was a disabled child who received special-education services from the Nebo School District (the district) (defendant). K.B.’s parents (plaintiffs) believed that K.B. had not been provided with a free appropriate public education (FAPE) as required under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and filed an administrative appeal over this issue. Dr. Steven Hirase was the impartial-hearing officer (IHO) who presided over the proceedings. Hirase was the assistant superintendent at a different school district. K.B.’s parents moved to disqualify Hirase, alleging that he was not impartial because Hirase’s wife and the district’s autism expert witness both worked in another school district. However, there was no evidence that Hirase’s wife and the expert witness worked together or even knew each other. Hirase denied K.B.’s parents’ motion and held that the district had provided K.B. with a FAPE. K.B.’s parents filed a complaint in federal district court seeking review of the decision. The district court affirmed Hirase’s decision, concluding that he had not been biased. K.B.’s parents appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Murphy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.