K.S. v. Detroit Public Schools

153 F. Supp. 3d 970 (2015)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

K.S. v. Detroit Public Schools

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
153 F. Supp. 3d 970 (2015)

Facts

Khody Sanford (plaintiff), a student of Detroit Public Schools (DPS) (defendant), was sexually harassed by Charles Pugh (defendant). Sanford reported the harassment, but DPS failed to take appropriate action. Sanford sued Pugh and DPS. Sanford asserted claims for emotional, psychological, and physical injuries and permanent and serious impairment of his social and academic development against both Pugh and DPS. Sanford asserted a Title IX claim solely against DPS based on physical injuries; mental and emotional distress; pain, grief, and anguish; medical expenses; and lost earning capacity. Sanford also asserted claims for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress solely against Pugh, alleging emotional, psychological, and physical injuries; permanent and severe impairment of his social and emotional development; and severe emotional distress. DPS settled the Title IX claim for $350,000. A jury found Pugh liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress and awarded Sanford a $250,000 verdict. Pugh argued that allowing Sanford to collect both the jury verdict and the DPS settlement would violate the one-recovery rule. Therefore, Pugh requested that the court reduce the verdict against him by the amount of the DPS settlement and enter a judgment against him for $0. The court considered Pugh’s request.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lawson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership