Kadota v. Hosogai

608 P.2d 68 (1980)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kadota v. Hosogai

Arizona Court of Appeals
608 P.2d 68 (1980)

Facts

The husband of Michiko Hosogai (Hosogai) (plaintiff) was a passenger in an automobile being driven by Hiroshi Kadota (Kadota) (defendant), a Japanese citizen, when the car got into an accident in Arizona. Hosogai’s husband died in the accident. Kadota suffered severe brain injuries and was hospitalized in Arizona before returning to Japan. Hosogai sued Kadota for negligence and made multiple attempts to effectuate service of process on Kadota. One attempt at service, according to Hosogai’s process server, was made by serving the state superintendent of motor vehicles pursuant to Arizona’s nonresident-motorists statute. Another attempt at service was made by a Japanese attorney who personally served a copy of the summons with a Japanese translation on Kadota in Japan. Kadota objected to service, arguing that these methods violated a treaty between the United States and Japan under the Hague Service Convention. Hosogai argued that these methods of service were permitted under Arizona rules of civil procedure. The court rejected Kadota’s objections, and the case went to trial. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of Hosogai and awarded money damages against Kadota. Kadota appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Haire, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership