Kaho v. Ilchert

765 F.2d 877 (1985)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kaho v. Ilchert

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
765 F.2d 877 (1985)

Facts

Customary adoptions were very common in Tonga and were an important aspect of Tongan culture. In 1982, the United States Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) considered whether Tongan customary adoptions were valid for immigration purposes. At that time, the BIA held that Tongan customary adoptions did not create a legal status or relationship under Tongan law and, for that reason, the BIA did not consider that customary adoptions were valid for immigration purposes. The BIA based its decision on two letters that the Tongan crown solicitor issued in the matter. In the first letter, the crown solicitor stated that customary adoptions were not recognized as legally valid under Tongan law, but the crown solicitor retracted that statement in a second letter. In the second letter, the crown solicitor further explained that customary adoptions created a parent-child relationship that was recognized by Tongan law. According to the letter, customary adoptions did not come before the court, because customary adoptions were accepted by Tongan society and therefore not subject to legal dispute. The issue came before the BIA again after the mother of two children, Valeti and Tupuo, died in Tonga. Valeti and Tupuo’s father gave their custody to a relative, Kuli Haapai Kaho (plaintiff). Kaho was a lawful permanent resident of the United States and filed a petition for a family-sponsored preference visa for Valeti and Tupuo, on the basis that Kaho customarily adopted them. David Ilchert (defendant), a district director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), denied the petition. Kaho appealed to the BIA, which affirmed the INS’s denial, concluding that customary adoption was not recognized as legal adoption in Tonga. Kaho appealed to a district court, which considered the two letters and the testimony of an anthropologist that in cases in which familial relationships were disputed, Tongan courts recognized customary adoptions. The district court reversed the BIA and remanded to the INS to determine whether Kaho’s adoption was a bona fide customary adoption. Ilchert appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wiggins, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership