From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Kaiser Steel Corporation v. State Board of Equalization
California Supreme Court
593 P.2d 864, 24 Cal. 188, 154 Cal. Rptr. 919 (1979)
Kaiser Steel Corporation (Kaiser) (plaintiff) manufactured and produced steel, pig iron, and other metals. To fire its furnaces and purify its metal products, Kaiser purchased and used various materials, including limestone, burnt lime, dolomite, and aluminum-magnesium alloy. Once the materials were used in the manufacturing process, some portion of the materials was incorporated into slag, which Kaiser sold to other companies. Under California’s tax laws, retail sales of tangible personal property were generally subject to sales and use taxes. The laws specifically provided that sales and use taxes applied to sales of tangible personal property purchased for use in manufacturing but did not apply to materials that were incorporated into a final manufactured product. A resale exemption from sales and use taxes was available for purchases made with the primary purpose of reselling the property. When Kaiser purchased the materials, it paid sales and use taxes on them. Kaiser applied for a tax refund from the California State Board of Equalization (the board) (defendant) for the sales and use taxes, claiming that the materials were purchased for the purpose of resale. The board denied Kaiser’s application for a tax refund, determining that Kaiser purchased the material to aid in manufacturing its metal products, not to resell the products. The trial court affirmed the board, finding that Kaiser’s primary purpose for purchasing the material was to use the material to aid in manufacturing. Kaiser appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Manuel, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.