Kakaes v. George Washington University
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
790 A.2d 581 (2002)
Dr. Apostolos Kakaes (plaintiff) was an assistant professor at George Washington University (GW) (defendant). GW’s faculty code provided that if an assistant professor was not going to be granted tenure at the end of the professor’s term, GW would notify the professor in writing no later than June 30 of the year before the professor’s term expired. The faculty code stated that if timely notice was not provided, the faculty member “shall acquire tenure at the end of the term.” Kakaes’s term was scheduled to end on May 30, 1994. On June 28, 1993, GW’s vice president wrote Kakaes a letter that said GW’s Board of Trustees was still deciding whether to award Kakaes tenure, and he would hear the outcome as soon as possible. When Kakaes still had not heard a final decision in October 1993, he sued GW, alleging that GW had not provided timely notice of its decision to deny tenure as required by the faculty code. At a bench trial, Kakaes presented evidence that his lost salary at GW for the latter half of 1994 and the first half of 1995 was $75,018. Kakaes also testified about what his salary would have been if GW had granted him tenure, but he did not present any expert testimony supporting his calculations. The court found that GW had failed to provide Kakaes with timely notice and awarded him $75,018 in damages. Kakaes appealed to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, arguing that the court should have required GW to grant him tenure and that the damages award was inadequate.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Schwelb, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.