Kallick v. SandRidge Energy, Inc.
Delaware Court of Chancery
68 A.3d 242 (2013)
Facts
TPG-Axon (TPG) was a hedge fund with a stake in SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SandRidge) (defendant). TPG launched a consent solicitation to seat a new majority on the SandRidge board. The incumbent board (incumbents) (defendants) opposed the consent solicitation and sought revocations from consenting stockholders. The incumbents warned stockholders that TPG’s slate was less qualified to run SandRidge than the incumbents and the election of TPG’s slate would be a change of control, triggering the proxy put in SandRidge’s credit agreements and requiring SandRidge to offer to repurchase its debt. Gerald Kallick (plaintiff), a SandRidge stockholder, brought an action alleging that the incumbents were breaching their fiduciary duties by failing to approve TPG’s slate because the proxy put would not be triggered if the incumbents approved the slate. Kallick sought injunctive relief to prevent shareholders from being pressured into re-electing the incumbents to avoid triggering the proxy put. Although the incumbents initially maintained that triggering the proxy put could harm SandRidge, they changed their position because the debt was trading at prices above the repurchase price in the credit agreements. The record established that approval of the TPG slate would not affect SandRidge’s ability to obtain financing and that the incumbents had no basis for doubting the integrity of TPG’s candidates.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Strine, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 706,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,400 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.