Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Kaloti Enterprises, Inc. v. Kellogg Sales Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court
699 N.W.2d 205 (2005)


Facts

Kaloti Enterprises, Inc. (Kaloti) (plaintiff) was a wholesaler of food products. For several years, Kaloti contracted with Kellogg Sales Company (Kellogg) (defendant) to sell Kellogg’s products. Kaloti always entered into these agreements through Geraci & Associates, Inc. (Geraci) (defendant). For each transaction, Geraci would solicit an order from Kaloti, Kellogg would drop-ship the product to Kaloti, and Kaloti would sell the product to large market stores. Geraci and Kellogg were aware that Kaloti resold the product to the stores. Kellogg changed marketing strategies and began selling products to the stores directly after acquiring Keebler Foods Company (Keebler). Kellogg and Geraci entered into a confidentiality agreement that prohibited Geraci from disclosing this change in strategy. Subsequently, Geraci solicited an order from Kaloti on May 14, 2001, without informing Kaloti of the change in practice. Kaloti purchased the product from Kellogg and attempted to sell the product to the stores. However, the stores refused to purchase the product because they were buying the product directly from Kellogg. Upon learning of this change, Kaloti sought to cancel the order and return the product. Kellogg refused, and Kaloti sued Kellogg and Geraci for fraudulent misrepresentation. The trial court granted Kellogg and Geraci’s motion to dismiss, and Kaloti appealed. The court of appeals certified the question to the Wisconsin Supreme Court of whether Kellogg and Geraci had a duty to disclose the change in Kellogg’s practice to Kaloti.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Roggensack, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.