Kannavos v. Annino
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
356 Mass. 42, 247 N.E.2d 708 (1969)
- Written by Christine Hilgeman, JD
Facts
Shortly after Apostolos Kannavos (plaintiff) purchased a multi-family building from Carrie Annino (defendant), the city of Springfield sought to abate the building’s use as a multi-family building. Kannavos had purchased the building after reading a newspaper advertisement describing the property as a multi-family income property. However, Annino had knowingly converted the building from a single family dwelling into a multi-family dwelling without the necessary permit. Annino knew that the zoning district where the building was located prohibited multi-family uses. Kannavos contracted to buy the property and did not inquire about zoning or building permits during the process. He was unaware of the zoning restrictions until the city took the abatement action. Annino was aware that Kannavos’ purpose in purchasing the property was to use it as a multi-family investment property. The value of the property was substantially lower as a single family dwelling. Kannavos filed a bill in equity against Annino seeking to rescind the purchase contract. The trial court denied a demurrer and granted rescission. Annino appealed the decision of the trial court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cutter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.