Kannavos v. Annino

356 Mass. 42, 247 N.E.2d 708 (1969)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kannavos v. Annino

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
356 Mass. 42, 247 N.E.2d 708 (1969)

Play video

Facts

Shortly after Apostolos Kannavos (plaintiff) purchased a multifamily building from Carrie Annino (defendant), the city of Springfield sought to abate the building’s use as a multifamily building. Kannavos had purchased the building after reading a newspaper advertisement describing the property as a multifamily income property. However, Annino had knowingly converted the building from a single-family dwelling into a multifamily dwelling without the necessary permit. Annino knew that the zoning district where the building was located prohibited multifamily uses. Kannavos contracted to buy the property and did not inquire about zoning or building permits during the process. He was unaware of the zoning restrictions until the city took the abatement action. Annino was aware that Kannavos’s purpose in purchasing the property was to use it as a multifamily investment property. The value of the property was substantially lower as a single-family dwelling. Kannavos filed a bill in equity against Annino seeking to rescind the purchase contract. The trial court denied a demurrer and granted rescission. Annino appealed the decision of the trial court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cutter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 833,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership