Kansas v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
214 F.3d 1196 (2000)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
The State of Kansas (plaintiff) filed suit against the United States (defendant), seeking declaratory and injunctive relief following changes made by Congress to the federal Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA). These changes required state programs for child-support enforcement, also known as IV-D programs, to meet certain federally mandated standards before states could receive block grants for the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) program, a welfare program under which the state received federal money to then distribute to the state’s needy families. Kansas argued that the IV-D program’s requirements were too onerous and expensive to operationalize, required too much manpower, and encroached upon the state’s ability to determine its own laws. The district court granted the federal government’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. Kansas appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Seymour, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.