Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Karahalios v. National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1263

United States Supreme Court
489 U.S. 527 (1989)


Facts

Karahalios (plaintiff) was a non-union employee of the Defense Language Institute/Foreign Language Center, Presidio of Monterey. Karahalios was given a promotion, but then demoted after another employee, Kuntelos, filed a grievance against him. Kuntelos was then promoted to Karahalios’ position. The National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1263 (union) (defendant) represented Kuntelos in his grievance and promotion. Karahalios then filed a grievance regarding his demotion. The union declined to represent Karahalios in his grievance citing a conflict of interest due to its representation of Kuntelos. Karahalios then filed an unfair labor practices charge with the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) against the Institute and the union. Under Title VII of the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA), unfair labor practice complaints are heard by the FLRA. The FLRA is authorized to order remedial action, such as awarding backpay. The General Counsel of the FLRA ruled that the union had violated its duty of fair representation and filed a complaint against the union. The complaint was resolved without any personal benefits to Karahalios, and as a result, Karahalios filed an action for damages in the federal district court against the institute and the union. The district court ruled that Karahalios could bring a private right of action against the union. The court of appeals reversed. Karahalios appealed and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.