Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Karl Wendt Farm Equipment Co. v. International Harvester Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
931 F.2d 1112 (1991)


Facts

Karl Wendt Farm Equipment Co. (Wendt) (plaintiff) entered a dealer-franchise agreement with International Harvester Co. (International) (defendant). The contract provided for termination for cause. The agreement also allowed International to make changes in product lines. International had similar agreements across the country. Due to an economic downturn, International was facing bankruptcy. International lost almost $2,000,000 per day under its dealer agreements. To avoid this, International sold part of the company, resulting in International breaching its agreement with Wendt. Wendt sued. International raised the defenses of impracticability and frustration of purpose. International also alleged that the contract allowed its termination under the circumstances and that there was an implied termination clause. Wendt moved for a directed verdict. The impracticability defense went to trial. The jury found in International’s favor. Wendt moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which was denied. Wendt appealed, and International cross-appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Ryan, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.