Karl Wendt Farm Equipment Co. v. International Harvester Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
931 F.2d 1112 (1991)
Facts
Karl Wendt Farm Equipment Co. (Wendt) (plaintiff) entered a dealer-franchise agreement with International Harvester Co. (International) (defendant). The contract provided for termination for cause. The agreement also allowed International to make changes in product lines. International had similar agreements across the country. Due to an economic downturn, International was facing bankruptcy. International lost almost $2,000,000 per day under its dealer agreements. To avoid this, International sold part of the company, resulting in International breaching its agreement with Wendt. Wendt sued. International raised the defenses of impracticability and frustration of purpose. International also alleged that the contract allowed its termination under the circumstances and that there was an implied termination clause. Wendt moved for a directed verdict. The impracticability defense went to trial. The jury found in International’s favor. Wendt moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which was denied. Wendt appealed, and International cross-appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)
Dissent (Ryan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 707,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
