Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Karon v. Karon

Supreme Court of Minnesota
435 N.W.2d 501 (1989)


Facts

Howard Karon (plaintiff) and Frima Karon (defendant) were married for almost 30 years. Howard filed for divorce, which was granted. Included in the divorce decree was a stipulation that Howard would pay Frima alimony in the amount of $1,200 per month for six years and $600 per month for the subsequent four years. The stipulation also provided that the court was divested from having any jurisdiction to award temporary or permanent spousal maintenance to either of the parties in the future. Howard worked as a vice president of sales at a large company and made a large salary, while Frima worked various low-salary jobs. Before the rehabilitative-alimony award expired, Frima moved the court for an order modifying the maintenance award. Frima requested that the court provide her with permanent maintenance of $3,500 per month. A referee, who is an individual appointed by the district judge to preside over civil hearings, held that the court had jurisdiction to hear the modification request despite Howard's challenges to the contrary. The district court agreed and affirmed the referee's order. After hearing the motion for modification, the referee determined that Frima was entitled to a permanent maintenance award of $1,500 per month. The trial court and the court of appeals affirmed. Howard appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Yetka, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Coyne, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.