From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Karpinski v. Collins
Court of Appeal of California, First District
60 Cal. Rptr. 846 (1967)
John Karpinski (plaintiff) was a small dairyman in the Santa Clara Valley. In April 1962, Karpinski received a call from Gene Collins (defendant), the president of the Santa Clara Creamery (Creamery) (defendant). Collins offered to purchase milk from Karpinski at a Grade A contract rate if Karpinski agreed to pay a secret rebate of 4.5 cents per gallon. Such rebates were prohibited by the Milk Stabilization Act. At the time, Karpinski had only been able to secure dairy contracts at the Grade B rate, which was 60 percent of the Grade A rate. The Grade B rate was considered insufficient to support a dairyman’s business. Karpinski accepted the offer, because he had no other Grade A options. On April 1, 1962, Karpinski entered a contract to sell the Creamery 51,600 pounds of Grade A milk per month at the Grade A rate. During the life of the contract, Collins billed Karpinski a monthly feeding charge that was equal to 4.5 cents per gallon of milk received. Karpinski paid the feeding charge but never received any feeding services. Karpinski later loaned Collins $6,500.00 in exchange for reducing the rebate to 3 cents per gallon. By October 1963, Karpinski was unable to continue paying the rebate. Collins terminated the contract. Karpinski sued Collins, Ruth Collins (defendant), and the Creamery to recover the $6,500.00 loan and $4,177.72 in rebates. The trial court ruled in Karpinski’s favor and granted him the requested total of $10,677.72. The defendants appealed on the grounds that the trial court erred in finding that Karpinski was not in pari delicto with the defendants.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Shoemaker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.