Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Karpinski v. Ingrasci

Court of Appeals of New York
268 N.E.2d 751 (1971)


Facts

Dr. Karpinski (plaintiff), an oral surgeon, hired Dr. Ingrasci (defendant), a recent graduate, to work in an office being opened by Karpinski in Ithaca, New York. The oral surgery practice drew from referrals throughout five counties: Cayuga, Tompkins, Seneca, Cortland, and Ontario. Ingrasci’s three-year employment agreement included a covenant not to compete that barred him from forever practicing dentistry or oral surgery in the counties of Cayuga, Tompkins, Seneca, Cortland, or Ontario unless his employment was terminated and another oral surgeon was hired to replace him. The contract further provided that Ingrasci would owe Karpinski $40,000 if he violated the noncompete. After the term of the contract had run, Ingrasci left Karpinski’s employ. One week later, he opened his own oral surgery practice in Ithaca. Ingrasci received most of the referrals that had previously gone to Karpinski, causing Karpinski to close his Ithaca office. Ninety percent of Ingrasci’s business came from the five counties identified in the covenant not to compete. Karpinski sued to enjoin Ingrasci’s practice and for payment of the $40,000. After a nonjury trial, the court decided in favor of Karpinski and awarded both injunctive and monetary relief. The appellate court reversed on the grounds that the covenant was overbroad. Karpinski appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Fuld, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.