Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.

United States Supreme Court
450 U.S.662 (1981)


Facts

Consolidated Freightways Corp. (Consolidated) (plaintiff) is a trucking company with routes that include shipping goods through Iowa. Consolidated uses both semi (one trailer) and twin (two trailers) trucks in its operations. Consolidated prefers to use sixty-five-foot long twin trucks because they can transport more goods at once. An Iowa state law, however, prohibited the use of most trucks longer than fifty-five feet within the state’s borders. Consolidated could either use other trailer options, detach its trailers at the Iowa border, or divert its trucks around the state. Consolidated was not satisfied with these options, and filed suit against Kassel (defendant), the state official responsible for enforcement of the Iowa statute, in federal district court on the ground that the Iowa state law unconstitutionally burdened interstate commerce. Iowa defended its law on the ground that it was necessary for highway safety. The district court concluded that there is no difference in safety between a semi and a twin truck, and held the Iowa law unconstitutional. The court of appeals affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (Brennan, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Rehnquist, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 205,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.