Katskee v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Nebraska
Nebraska Supreme Court
245 Neb. 808, 515 N.W.2d 645 (1994)
Sindie Katskee (plaintiff) consulted Dr. Henry Lynch regarding her family’s history of breast and ovarian cancer. Lynch diagnosed Katskee as suffering from a genetic condition called breast-ovarian carcinoma syndrome and recommended that she undergo an operation to remove her uterus, ovaries, and fallopian tubes. Even though Katskee was diagnosed with a genetic condition with a high risk for developing cancer, Katskee did not have cancer. Prior to the procedure being performed, Katskee filed a claim with her insurance provider, Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Nebraska (BCBSN) (defendant). Additionally, Lynch and another physician wrote letters to BCBSN on Katskee’s behalf noting why the operation was needed. BCBSN mailed a letter to Katskee informing her that it “might” pay for the surgery. However Dr. Roger Mason, BCBSN’s chief medical officer, denied the claim two weeks before the scheduled operation. Mason stated it was not medically necessary and not covered under Katskee’s policy. Katskee proceeded to have the operation performed. After the operation, Katskee filed an action against BCBSN for breach of contract and sought to recover the costs of the operation. The district court granted BCBSN’s motion for summary judgment and held that Katskee did not suffer from cancer and although her heightened risk warranted the operation, it was not covered under her insurance policy. The district court also held that Katskee did not have a “bodily illness” or “disease” covered by the policy and that BCBSN reserved the right to determine what procedure or operation was considered “medically necessary.” Katskee appealed to the court of appeals and, on motion, the case was removed to the supreme court for consideration.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 707,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 707,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.