Kay Berry, Inc. v. Taylor Gifts, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
421 F.3d 199 (2005)

- Written by Miller Jozwiak, JD
Facts
Kay Berry, Inc. (plaintiff) was a company that produced accent rocks for gardens. The rocks were cement sculptures with inscribed writings. In 1997, Kay Berry submitted its rock catalogue for copyright registration. The United States Copyright Office issued a copyright-registration certificate to Kay Berry for sculptural works with design and text. One of the accent rocks, called sculpture number 646, had a poem inscribed on it. Taylor Gifts, Inc. (Taylor) (defendant) later began selling a memory stone. The memory stone was a stone-like rectangular object that had the same poem on it as that inscribed on sculpture number 646. Kay Berry sued Taylor for copyright infringement. Taylor moved for summary judgment. The district court granted Taylor’s motion, reasoning, in part, that sculpture number 646 was an expression inseparable from the underlying idea and was therefore not copyrightable. Kay Berry appealed. Kay Berry argued, among other things, that the district court incorrectly concluded that the expression in sculpture number 646 was inseparable from the underlying idea.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Van Antwerpen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.