KB v. National Health Service Pensions Agency
European Court of Justice
C-117/01, 2004 E.C.R. 541 (2004)

- Written by Miller Jozwiak, JD
Facts
KB (plaintiff) was a nurse for the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) (defendant). Over 20 years, KB contributed to the NHS’s pension system through regular contributions. The pension program provided that benefits would be paid out to a surviving spouse of a worker, meaning the person to whom the worker was married. KB was in a long-term relationship with R., who had undergone female-to-male gender-reassignment surgery. KB wanted her pension to go to R. in the event of KB’s death, just as it would have done had KB been married to a person who was assigned male gender at birth. But under United Kingdom law, any marriage in which the participants were not male and female (as assigned at birth) was void. The couple thus could not marry, and because they were not married, R. was not eligible to receive the pension in the event of KB’s death. KB sued in United Kingdom courts, claiming that the system was discriminatory. The matter was referred to the European Court of Justice to determine whether the application of United Kingdom law would violate the law of the European Union.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.