Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Kedra v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
454 F. Supp. 652 (1978)


Facts

In a series of events that took place over the course of a year and a half, police officers employed by the City of Philadelphia (defendants) allegedly committed various unconstitutional acts against members of the Kedra family, including arrests without probable cause, interrogations lasting some seventeen hours, violent beatings, illegal searches of their home, unlawful detentions, and other types of harassment. The Kedra family sued the police officers, the commissioner, the City of Philadelphia, and others (defendants) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of their civil rights. The named plaintiffs are Delores Kedra (Kedra); her children Elizabeth, Patricia, Teresa, Kenneth, and Joseph; and her son-in-law Richard Rozanski (plaintiffs). In addition, Kedra sued on behalf of her minor children, Michael, Robert, and James. The complaint alleged violations of the First, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, as well as articles of the Pennsylvania Constitution. The defendants moved to dismiss the claim on two grounds: (1) Kedra did not have standing to sue on behalf of her minor children and (2) the defendants were improperly joined.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Luongo, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.