Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Keelan v. Majesco Software, Inc.

407 F.3d 332 (2005)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...

Keelan v. Majesco Software, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

407 F.3d 332 (2005)

Facts

Ivor Keelan and David Sullivan (plaintiffs) sued their employer, Majesco Software, Inc. (Majesco) (defendant), raising mixed-motive discrimination claims. The district court dismissed Keelan’s and Sullivan’s complaints, finding that they did not show prima facie cases of discrimination and that Keelan presented no evidence that Majesco had both legitimate and illegitimate motives for discharging him. Keelan and Sullivan appealed, arguing that the district court improperly evaluated their mixed-motive claims because a recent United States Supreme Court decision, Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa, 539 U.S. 90 (2003), changed the framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), for determining whether an employer’s adverse action had a discriminatory purpose.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (DeMoss, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,700 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership