Keller v. Holderman
Michigan Supreme Court
11 Mich. 248 (1863)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Keller (defendant) wrote Holderman (plaintiff) a check for $300 for a watch that was worth about $15. Keller had no money in his account, and his bank refused to honor the check. Keller, however, kept the watch. Holderman sued Keller, alleging breach of contract. The trial court found that both parties intended the transaction to be a joke, but held that the conduct nevertheless formed a contract. The court thus ruled in favor of Holderman, requiring Keller to pay the $300. Keller appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Martin, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.