Kelley v. Tanoos
Indiana Supreme Court
865 N.E.2d 593 (2007)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Paul “Jay” Kelley (plaintiff) was the safety supervisor at the Gibault School (Gibault) in Vigo County. James Sinclair was Gibault’s executive director. Daniel Tanoos (defendant) was the superintendent of the Vigo County School Corporation (VCSC). Someone fired a shotgun at Tanoos from outside his house. Kelley was identified as a suspect. Gibault permitted police interviews of employees but insisted that second interviews be conducted outside working hours. Concerned about rumors that Gibault was not cooperating and strained relations between Gibault and VCSC, Sinclair suggested to Tanoos that they meet. The police had Tanoos wear a wire and record the conversation. At the meeting, Tanoos tried to coax information from Sinclair by saying, “I’m as convinced as the police are that Jay Kelley did it.” Kelley was never charged in connection with the shooting. Kelley sued Tanoos for defamation. The court granted Tanoos’s motion and denied Kelley’s motion for summary judgment. Kelley appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
