Kellos v. Sawilowsky
Georgia Supreme Court
325 S.E.2d 757 (1985)
- Written by Ross Sewell, JD
Facts
Kellos (plaintiff) sued attorney Sawilowsky for legal malpractice. Sawilowsky filed a motion for summary judgment, contending in his affidavit that he exercised the degree of skill, prudence, and diligence that lawyers of ordinary skill and capacity exercise in the state of Georgia. Kellos opposed Sawilowsky’s motion with an affidavit of an attorney who believed that Sawilowsky failed to exercise the degree of skill, prudence, and diligence that lawyers of ordinary skill and capacity exercise in Georgia. The trial court granted Sawilowsky’s motion for summary judgment without giving a reason. Kellos appealed, and in a split decision, the court of appeals affirmed. The majority held that Kellos’s expert evidence did not create an issue of fact and that the affidavit used the standard of practice in the state of Georgia rather than in the profession generally. The Georgia Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether the standard of skill, prudence, and diligence of lawyers practicing in Georgia is that of the locality (i.e., the state of Georgia) or of the legal profession generally, if the standards differ.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
