From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
477 N.E.2d 582 (1985)
Helen Kelly (plaintiff) worked for Raytheon Corporation for 22 years as an associate training specialist and ran Raytheon’s training center. On Friday, August 19, 1977, Kelly was told she would be laid off. Kelly started crying, could not compose herself, and went home early. Kelly remained upset over the weekend. On Monday, August 22, Kelly was told she could transfer to another department. However, Kelly did not want to work in another department, and she became depressed, developed chest pains, and was taken to a hospital, where she was put on medication. Kelly was out of work for six weeks. Kelly returned to work in her new department on October 5, but on October 14, she again developed chest pains and was taken to the hospital. Kelly lost weight, had difficulty sleeping, and underwent psychiatric treatment for depression. Kelly filed a workers’ compensation claim against Raytheon’s insurer (defendant). Based on the testimony of Kelly’s psychiatrist, a review by a single member of the Industrial Accident Board found that Kelly had been totally disabled since August 22, and that learning she was going to be laid off from one department and transferred to another caused Kelly’s depression. However, because Kelly had not suffered an injury arising out of or in the course of her employment, the single member’s review concluded that Kelly was not entitled to compensation. The reviewing board agreed. The superior court reversed, entered judgment in favor of Kelly, and awarded her compensation. The appeals court affirmed. Raytheon’s insurer appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
Dissent (Hennessey, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 606,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 606,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.