Kemp v. Balboa

23 F.3d 211 (1994)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kemp v. Balboa

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
23 F.3d 211 (1994)

SC
Play video

Facts

Kemp (plaintiff) was a prisoner who was allowed to take epilepsy medication and keep the medicine in his cell. Balboa (defendant), a prison guard, repeatedly confiscated Kemp’s medicine and flushed it down the toilet. As a result, Kemp suffered from epileptic seizures and involuntarily injured himself. Kemp brought suit against Balboa. At trial, Vicki Maness, a nurse at the prison, testified that Kemp had failed to pick up his medicine on a number of occasions. On cross-examination, Maness admitted that she was not working the days Kemp failed to pick up his medicine and that her only knowledge of the frequency with which Kemp picked up his medicine was from Kemp’s medical chart, which she did not fill out. Kemp moved to strike the testimony for lack of personal knowledge. The trial court denied Kemp’s motion. The jury found in favor of Kemp, but only awarded him $1.00 in nominal damages. Kemp appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Friedman, S.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership