Kendall v. United States ex rel. Stokes
United States Supreme Court
37 U.S. 524, 12 Pet. 524 (1838)
Facts
The former postmaster general of the United States Postal Services had made a contract with Stockton & Stokes (S&S) (plaintiff) that allowed certain credits and allowances for S&S’s transportation of the mail. Amos Kendall (defendant) was later appointed the new postmaster general and directed that the allowances and credits should be withdrawn. S&S brought the matter before Congress. Congress then enacted a law that directed Kendall to pay the sums of money as recommended by the solicitor of the treasury, Virgil Maxcy. Kendall refused to pay the total set by Maxcy. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Kendall to pay the sums. Kendall brought the case before the United States Supreme Court by a writ of mandamus, arguing that the legislature cannot control performance of an executive officer’s official duties.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thompson, J.)
Dissent (Taney, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 709,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
