Kenford Co. v. County of Erie

67 N.Y.2d 257 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kenford Co. v. County of Erie

New York Court of Appeals
67 N.Y.2d 257 (1986)

JL
Play video

Facts

The County of Erie (defendant) entered into a contract with Kenford Company, Inc., (plaintiff) and Dome Stadium, Inc., (DSI) (plaintiff) in 1969 for the construction of a domed-stadium facility near Buffalo, New York. Under the contract, Kenford and DSI were required to begin construction within 12 months, and the parties were required to negotiate toward a mutually agreeable 40-year lease. The contract also stated that if the parties could not agree on the lease, then the parties would enter into a 20-year management contract providing that DSI would operate the facility. Despite extensive negotiations, the parties failed to reach an agreement on the lease, and Kenford and DSI did not construct the stadium. Kenford and DSI sued Erie for breach of contract. During the trial, DSI presented extensive expert and economic evidence regarding expected profits from operating the stadium for 20 years. DSI’s witnesses used the Astrodome in Houston as a basis for comparison. After trial, the jury returned with a multimillion-dollar verdict for Kenford and DSI. Erie appealed, and the appellate division reduced the damages award by reversing the portion of the damages award to DSI related to lost profits over 20 years for operating the stadium. DSI appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership