Kennedy v. State Department of Pensions and Security
Alabama Supreme Court
277 Ala. 5, 166 So. 2d 736 (1964)
- Written by Meredith Hamilton Alley, JD
Facts
Mr. Kennedy (defendant) earned a bachelor’s degree and owned a successful insurance business despite having a serious physical disability. He married Anne Elizabeth Stower (Mrs. Kennedy) (defendant), who had the same disability. The Kennedys managed the birth and care of their first child without difficulty, but the birth of their second child triggered the collapse of the family. Because of the stress of raising two small children while living with a disability, Mrs. Kennedy began acting irrationally, requiring several stays for inpatient psychiatric treatment. During one of those stays, she discovered that she was pregnant with a third child. Because of Mrs. Kennedy’s psychiatric illness, Mr. Kennedy started spending less time at work and more time at home, causing his income to decrease. The community provided financial and emotional support, but the Kennedys were still unable to successfully care for their family, leading the Kennedys to have violent arguments in the presence of the children. The state (plaintiff) filed a complaint, seeking custody of the three children. Based on the evidence of the Kennedys’ struggles, the juvenile court found that the Kennedys were morally unfit to be parents and awarded custody to the state, with the discretion to place the children for adoption. The Kennedys appealed, arguing that there was insufficient evidence of their moral unfitness to remove custody. The circuit court affirmed the trial court. The Kennedys appealed again.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Harwood, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.