Kent v. United States
United States Supreme Court
383 U.S. 541 (1966)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
An intruder entered the apartment of a woman in the District of Columbia and raped her. The police later found fingerprints and matched them to 16-year-old Morris Kent (defendant), who was already on probation for housebreaking. After police took Kent into custody and interrogated him for seven hours, Kent confessed his involvement, and the police placed Kent in detention. Kent's attorney filed a motion with the juvenile court for a hearing on the question of waiver of jurisdiction and offered to prove that Kent would be a suitable subject for rehabilitation. The juvenile court did not rule on the motion. Instead, the juvenile court waived jurisdiction over Kent without a hearing and without stating any reasons for the waiver. The juvenile court then directed that Kent be tried in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. After being convicted in district court, Kent appealed, contesting the validity of the juvenile court's waiver. The court of appeals affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fortas, J.)
Dissent (Stewart, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
