Kentucky Association of Health Plans, Inc. v. Miller
United States Supreme Court
538 U.S. 329 (2003)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Kentucky statutes prohibited any health insurer from discriminating against healthcare providers and chiropractors who were willing and able to meet the terms and conditions for participation in the insurer’s health-insurance plan. These statutes were known as Any Willing Provider (AWP) statutes. The Kentucky Association of Health Plans, Inc., and several HMOs (plaintiffs) challenged the AWP statutes on the ground that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1140, preempted state laws relating to plans governed by ERISA. The district court found that the AWP statutes were related to ERISA plans but fell within an exception to the preemption provision, because the statutes regulated insurance. The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.