Kentucky Department of Highways v. Lindon

380 S.W.2d 247 (1964)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kentucky Department of Highways v. Lindon

Kentucky Court of Appeals
380 S.W.2d 247 (1964)

Facts

William Lindon (plaintiff) was employed by the Kentucky Department of Highways (the department) (defendant). Lindon sustained a minor, temporary injury to his foot in a work-related accident. However, due to a psychological condition, Lindon became convinced that he was instead suffering from constant foot and leg pain that rendered him unable to work. Lindon’s psychiatrist recommended that Lindon undergo treatment including a series of sodium-amytal interviews, during which the psychiatrist would give Lindon a sedative that would make Lindon more susceptible to accepting the truth about his injury through the power of suggestion. The treatment did not involve any physical suffering or discomfort. Lindon refused to undergo the treatment, and Lindon’s doctor did not believe that the sodium-amytal treatment alone would successfully cure Lindon’s condition. Lindon sought workers’-compensation benefits, and the Workmen’s Compensation Board awarded Lindon benefits for total permanent disability. The board concluded that Lindon was suffering from compensation neurosis, a medically recognized mental disability by which a person unconsciously exaggerates the physical symptoms of an injury for as long as the person continues to receive compensation. The board found that Lindon’s refusal to submit to the treatment was not unreasonable. The board further found that the sodium-amytal treatment could hinder Lindon’s recovery and that Lindon’s resistance to the treatment would prevent the treatment from working, even though there was no medical evidence before the board to support those findings. A state circuit court upheld the board’s award, and the department appealed to the Kentucky Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Davis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 791,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership