From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...
Kentucky Fried Chicken National Management Co. v. Weathersby
Maryland Court of Appeals
607 A.2d 8 (1992)
Serita Weathersby (plaintiff) worked as a training store manager for Kentucky Fried Chicken National Management Co. (KFC) (defendant). Weathersby’s supervisor, Lee Watts, was dating an assistant manager at Weatherby’s store, causing Weathersby to lodge a complaint with the company and confront Watts. As a result, Watts began harassing Weathersby. After money was found missing from the cash register at Weathersby’s store, Weathersby informed KFC’s regional security director that Watts had not changed the locks in the cash register, and she also informed the director of Watts’s relationship with his subordinate. A few days later, Watts suspended Weathersby in front of customers and employees and ultimately demoted her. After this, Weathersby had to seek psychiatric help and was admitted to the hospital for six weeks. Weathersby’s doctor indicated she suffered from borderline personality traits, which could cause her great distress. The doctor also noted that such traits would not necessarily be noticed by employers. As a result of her injuries, Weathersby brought suit against KFC for intentional infliction of emotional distress. A jury found in favor of Weathersby and awarded her damages. KFC moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and the trial court granted the motion, noting there was no evidence that KFC knew Weathersby suffered from an emotional condition that made her more vulnerable to emotional distress. Weathersby appealed. The court of special appeals reversed and held that Weathersby submitted sufficient proof for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Chasanow, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 608,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 608,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.