Kentucky v. Reinhold

325 S.W.3d 272 (2010)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kentucky v. Reinhold

Kentucky Supreme Court
325 S.W.3d 272 (2010)

  • Written by Nicole Gray , JD

Facts

E. John Reinhold, the American Evangelistic Association, and Christian Care Ministry (defendants) operated a program called Medi-Share, which was advertised as a sharing ministry that provided a biblical way of managing healthcare costs. Members would apply for enrollment in the program and pay an enrollment fee to be added to the pool of members who would share healthcare costs of other members. Members paid annual fees, which were added to subaccounts that acted as escrow accounts to pay medical bills for members who submitted claims and whose expenses were covered under the plan as determined by claim adjusters. When members’ claims were approved, Medi-Share paid the members’ outstanding medical bills directly to their medical providers from other members’ subaccounts. The program was based on the Christian principle of mutual sharing. However, like health-insurance plans, the program had preexisting-condition exclusions and used health-insurance-underwriting standards. Medi-Share’s application form expressly stated that the program was not insurance, and its commitment contract expressly disclaimed liability for members’ medical bills. However, the commonwealth of Kentucky filed suit against Reinhold, American Evangelistic Association, and Christian Care Ministry for the unauthorized sale of insurance. A state circuit court found that Medi-Share was not insurance because the program did not shift the burden of payment of members’ medical bills to Medi-Share. The commonwealth appealed. A court of appeals affirmed the circuit court in a split decision. The commonwealth again appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Venters, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 789,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 789,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 789,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership