Keohane v. Florida Department of Corrections Secretary
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
952 F.3d 1257 (2020)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Reiyn Keohane (plaintiff) was a male-to-female transgender individual incarcerated in a men’s prison operated by the Florida Department of Corrections (DOC) (defendant). After Keohane was incarcerated, she requested to continue receiving hormone treatments and requested permission to socially transition by physically presenting as female. The DOC ultimately granted Keohane’s request for continued hormone treatment following a protracted initial denial. The DOC also provided counseling, gave Keohane access to private shower facilities, and referred to Keohane using female pronouns. However, the DOC denied Keohane’s request to socially transition, stating that Keohane’s request violated prison grooming policies and that allowing Keohane to present as female would pose security risks in the all-male prison. After the initial denial, Keohane continued to request permission to socially transition. At the same time, Keohane’s mental health declined, and she attempted to self-harm and self-castrate and made three suicide attempts. Keohane ultimately sued the DOC in district court and sought injunctive relief, arguing that the DOC’s refusal to allow her to socially transition violated the Eighth Amendment because it constituted deliberate indifference to Keohane’s gender dysphoria, a serious medical need. At trial, Keohane’s medical expert and the DOC’s medical team disagreed about whether social transitioning was medically necessary to treat Keohane’s gender dysphoria. The district court ruled for Keohane and ordered the DOC to allow Keohane to socially transition. The DOC appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Newsom, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.