Kerns v. Hoppe

128 Nev. 910 (2012)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kerns v. Hoppe

Nevada Supreme Court
128 Nev. 910 (2012)

JL

Facts

Walter Kerns (plaintiff) was in multiple motorcycle accidents and suffered from intense knee pain. Kerns planned to have surgery but was receiving treatment to manage the pain until the surgery. Dr. Walter Hoppe, David Armitage, and Desert Trails Medical, Inc. (defendants) treated Kerns and prescribed interchanging painkillers, including Norco, OxyContin, Vicodin, and methadone. The prescriptions rotated in an attempt to avoid addiction to any one painkiller. However, the defendants eventually diagnosed Kerns with an addiction to OxyContin. The defendants required Kerns to sign an acknowledgement that it was illegal to obtain multiple prescriptions from various doctors and that obtaining multiple prescriptions could endanger his health. The acknowledgement also contained a promise that Kerns would not request or accept narcotics from any other medical provider. Unfortunately, Kerns did go to other doctors and obtain additional prescriptions for narcotics. Kerns died in his sleep from methadone intoxication. Stephanie Kerns, his widow, sued the defendants and the pharmacies that filled the prescriptions. The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing that Kerns assumed the risk of his death by abusing the drugs prescribed to him. The trial court granted the motion, and Stephanie appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lane, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership