Kerr v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
113 T.C. 449 (1999)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Baine and Mildred Kerr (plaintiffs) created two family limited partnerships (FLPs) in accordance with the Texas Revised Limited Partnership Act (TRLPA). Both the Kerrs and their children were partners in the FLPs. The FLPs’ terms provided for dissolution and liquidation upon the earlier of (1) December 31, 2043, or (2) the agreement of all partners. The TRLPA provided for dissolution of Texas limited partnerships on the earlier of (1) the occurrence of events specified in the agreement to cause dissolution, (2) the written consent of all partners, (3) the withdrawal of a general partner, or (4) entry of a judicial dissolution decree. The Kerrs donated partnership interests to their children and also created trusts into which they transferred partnership assets and from which they retained a right to receive annuities. The Kerrs reported these transfers on their federal gift-tax returns, which included valuation discounts for lack of liquidity or marketability. The discounts were meant to reflect the FLPs’ restrictions on liquidation. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) disallowed the discounts on the ground that Internal Revenue Code § 2704(b) operated to disregard restrictions on liquidation. The Kerrs challenged this determination in the United States Tax Court, where they moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of § 2704(b) applicability.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jacobs, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.